
By
Michael
Schneider
|
Variety
Magazine
As
the
Emmy-winning
laffer
prepares
its
final
episodes,
it's
clear
everybody
really
did
love
"Raymond".
The
show's
impending
departure
doesn't
bode
well
for
the
sitcom
genre,
which
hasn't
been
able
to
recapture
the
humor
and
spirit
of
"Everybody
Loves
Raymond"
in
recent
years.
Before
it
goes
away,
net
and
studio
execs
could
take
away
a
few
more
lessons
from
the
hit
comedy.
"Everybody
Loves
Raymond"
was
a
case
study
in
how
a
show
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
jump
the
shark
-
thanks
in
part
to
the
stability
of
its
cast
and
writing
team,
led
by
creator
Phil
Rosenthal.
And
it
reminded
webheads
that
patience
can
pay
off.
The
Ray
Romano
starrer
also
redefined
the
family
sitcom
-
turns
out
it
doesn't
have
to
be
about
the
kids
-
and
proved
that
CBS
could
generate
an
off-network
sitcom
hit.
"I
think
it
will
be
remembered
for
taking
the
traditional
family
comedy,
which
felt
like
it
was
so
familiar,
and
turning
it
on
its
ear;
making
it
so
eccentric
and
smart
and
funny
in
unexpected
ways,"
says
CBS
comedy
senior
VP
Wendi
Trilling.
On
the
surface,
the
series'
conceit
sounded
rather
simple:
Suburban
man
juggles
wife,
kids
and
pesky
parents
(who
happen
to
live
next
door).
But
out
of
that
setup,
the
show
found
humor
in
the
most
ordinary
situations.
"I'm
very
proud
to
say
that
we
kind
of
had
it
right
out
of
the
gate,"
Rosenthal
says.
"Certain
characters
were
well-delineated
right
away...For
the
most
part,
I
think
we
hit
the
ground
running.
I'm
proud
of
that.
And
I
think
we
grew
from
there."
It's
common
knowledge
by
now
that
Rosenthal
and
his
team
tap
into
their
own
lives
and
adapt
those
real-life
moments
to "Raymond"'s
Barone
family.
Scribe
Tucker
Crawley,
for
example,
once
spent
several
weeks
quietly
sparring
with
his
wife
over
who
would
put
away
the
empty
suitcase.
That
scenario
was
eventually
adapted
for
Ray
and
Debra.
Then
there
was
the
time,
Rosenthal
went
to
parents'
night
at
his
kids'
school
for
a
"kids
read
their
stories
out
loud
day."
Rosenthal's
son
Ben
got
up
and
read,
"The
Angry
Family."
"I
was
mortified,"
Rosenthal
says,
"but
then,
in a
split
second
I
thought
how
lucky
am I
to
have
a
child
who
writes
for
my
television
show."
Of
course,
it's
easy
to
forget
that
"Raymond"
didn't
start
as
the
tentpole
megahit
that
it
is
today.
Launching
on
Fridays
in
1996,
the
"Raymond"
pilot
tested
just
"above
average"
-
and
then
stumbled
out
of
the
gate.
Still,
Eye
execs
never
lost
faith.
CBS'
moved
the
show
to
Mondays
at
8:30
in
midseason,
behind
"Cosby."
"It
felt
like
an
underdog
for
sure,"
Trilling
says.
"But
it
never
felt
like
it
was
on
the
brink
of
cancellation.
Everyone
wanted
it
to
succeed.
Of
course,
there
was
a
lot
riding
on
that
first
Monday
night
airing."
The
pressure
was
on.
Rosenthal
remembers
a
call
from
Les
Mooves,
who
was
then
entertainment
president,
telling
him
that
"the
critics
love
the
show,
we
love
the
show,
but
if
you
don't
perform
better
here,
we
can't
help
you
anymore."
They
did.
Rosenthal
credits
TV
critics
for
helping
get
the
show
out
of
its
Friday
death
slot.
"Raymond,"
of
course
went
on
to
become
the
first
big
syndication
hit
for
a
CBS
laffer
since
"MASH".
Patience
paid
off
and
the
sitcom
will
be
forever
cited
as
an
example
of
how
a
good
show
can
start
slow
but
grow
into
a
huge
success
with
some
luck
and
nurturing.
Even
then,
few
shows
manage
to
keep
the
same
quality
going
to
the
end.
Critics
believed
"Seinfeld"
and
"Friends"
overstayed
their
welcome
-
but
not
"Raymond."
At
this
point,
"Raymond"
is
on
taps
to
produce
16
episodes
this
season
before
taking
one
final
bow.
Rosenthal
says
he
hopes
the
show's
legacy
boils
down
to
one
simple
question:
Is
this
episode
worth
watching
again?
"We
like
to
think
that
we
haven't
done
a
bad
episode,"
he
says.
"We
like
to
think
that
very
episode
has
a
tiny
bit
of
laughter.
Sure,
some
are
better
than
others,
but
we
may
mistakenly
believe
that
we
have
done
all
good
episodes."
And
what
about
the
future
of
the
sitcom,
now
that
"Raymond"
is
retiring?
Rosenthal
clearly
gets
that
question
a
lot.
"I've
heard
the
question
asked,
'Does
this
mean
the
end
of
an
era?
Does
this
mean
the
end
of
sitcoms?'
And
I
think
yes,"
he
quips.
"I
think
not
only
on
television,
but
comedy
everywhere.
In
fact
I
don't
see
any
more
laughter
coming
anywhere." 